It has circular logic in it:
* Thesis "Pao hates women" — I expect it to be proven in the following points.
* Some proof...
* Some more proof...
* Some proof of the opposite — but as we know, Ellen Pao is a misogynist [so it's false, and now we don't consider this fact anymore]
And overall, it's written more like a propaganda piece than an actual analysis.
It has circular logic in it:
* Thesis "Pao hates women" — I expect it to be proven in the following points.
* Some proof...
* Some more proof...
* Some proof of the opposite — but as we know, Ellen Pao is a misogynist [so it's false, and now we don't consider this fact anymore]
And overall, it's written more like a propaganda piece than an actual analysis.