Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

To add some context, starbucks do appear to invite whitehat security testing in a bug-bounty like manner:

http://www.starbucks.com/about-us/company-information/online...

That means that Homakov was likely not breaking the law, and you would expect starbacks to be more welcoming of the report.



The thing about big companies is that the person responding to the inbound communcation is usually in a totally separate department from the person who wrote the policy, and often doesn't know the policy exists. It's really hard to get a group of 50,000 people to act consistently with each other.

Of course, I hope for Starbucks' sake that it quickly backtracks and thanks this guy with at a minimum a bunch of free Starbucks and a phone call or email from the CIO or CEO. It's not in Starbucks' interest to dissuade white hat hacking, since black hat hackers don't care about Starbucks' policies.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: