What if it's debug() instead of debug? That could be an expensive function that ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

nulltype on May 8, 2015 | parent | context | favorite | on: Why Lisp?

What if it's debug() instead of debug? That could be an expensive function that does a bunch of things to produce the debug output.

kedean on May 8, 2015 [–]

Solid point, that would be a downside of the slf4j approach.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact