What you describe is a statutory challenge. A constitutional challenge would be that the statute authorizing the conduct went beyond the enumerated powers in the Constitution, or that the conduct went beyond the President's inherent Article II authorities, or that it violated rights protected by the Bill of Rights.
That someone is violating checks and balances isn't really a cause of action; you would be more specific in your case.
That someone is violating checks and balances isn't really a cause of action; you would be more specific in your case.