Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It feels like the author likes to see his family suffer and fundamentally misunderstands reality:

> everyone has the problem of not spending enough quality time with friends and family. Travel is the best and most meaningful way to do that.

Travel is an acceptable means to making it possible to achieve the end goal of spending time with friends and family, especially when separated by great distances. However as a means of directly spending time with one another travel is the most time-consuming and stressful way to do that; especially when you mix the ambiguity of squishy human sentiments with a rigid travel schedule.

And this is probably why nobody really gives a damn to use such things.



This is a lifestyle question and these are hard to generalize. It works well for me personally. 3-4 days someplace doing sightseeing, or maybe some outdoor activity is an accessible way of spending a few days with someone and having time that we wouldn't otherwise have. Many of my friends and family live in a different country. Flights and accommodation are affordable. Time is scarce and if we visit eachother in one of our normal lives, it's harder to find whole days to relax hang out.

A context for spending time together is (to generalize) a pretty good way of maintaining relationships, relaxing and having fun. You might have a friend, parent or child with whom you occasionally go fishing, hunting, bird spotting or whatnot. You might have an old army friend you meet every few years for something else. You might have a cousin you meet for a run once a week. Whatever the specifics, context for spending time together between people works in many cases.

Travel is a good context. It's accessible, easy to arrange and works for a lot of people you might want to catch up with.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: