The Net Neutrality discussion has always been about punitive throttling
Not on HN. Some here on HN insist that any interference with bits-in-bits-out, including QoS, violates NN.
I've mostly given up on NN debates. In addition to debating the merits of the various positions, we also have moving names for each position, and people really insistent (not you that I've yet seen) that their definition is the "right one."
Not on HN. Some here on HN insist that any interference with bits-in-bits-out, including QoS, violates NN.
I've mostly given up on NN debates. In addition to debating the merits of the various positions, we also have moving names for each position, and people really insistent (not you that I've yet seen) that their definition is the "right one."