Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've used both and actually prefer Derby. They don't toss out Node (which the Meteor team did), thus making it easy to leverage the growing Node ecosystem. Also, I'm constantly left scratching my head as to why the Meteor team chose to make backend code synchronous.

That being said, Meteor simply has a lot more developer talent (and money) behind it. Hence it's improving at a much faster rate than Derby.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: