Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That is the null hypothesis, yes. Do you have evidence otherwise?
 help



A good portion of people hate A.I. and won't even use it...they won't use a computer program to enhance their intellience, much less taking a pill...

This is an inference, not evidence. It doesn't meet my epistemic standard necessary to reject the null hypothesis.

Good for you. But you introduced this statement:

> AI-developed nootropics and germline editing will saturate human intelligence across individuals.

This is a forum, not a Bayesian-updating machine. So common courtesy is for you to take up the burden of proof for your own statements. Why do you think this is the null?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: