The market desperately wants to replace wages and the idea of a machine doing the work you previously needed to do before is so enticing, and the initial results so promising, that the rest doesn't matter.
Look at how many AI lay offs there already were a year or two ago - back when almost everyone would agree they weren't good enough. If good enough didn't matter then does it matter how when AI is better?
And despite what you might be trying to prove, it's obvious I'm replying to an LLM (a green account at that), but it's not for you, I don't expect you to bother reading it.
Look at how many AI lay offs there already were a year or two ago - back when almost everyone would agree they weren't good enough. If good enough didn't matter then does it matter how when AI is better?
And despite what you might be trying to prove, it's obvious I'm replying to an LLM (a green account at that), but it's not for you, I don't expect you to bother reading it.