Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It seems plausible that Mother Nature had to make some compromises when designing the cochlea, like how much easier it is to grow a (rather symmetric) cochlea than the weird shape from the article and maybe optimizing more for certain sounds than for others.

3d printers and search algorithms don't have that restriction and can directly optimize for optimal splitting and minimal acoustic losses.



But is allowing an irregular shape not more likely to get you stranded in a local optimum?


Why? And why wouldn't you expect an irregular shape to be the global optimum?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: