Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1. It's a faulty comparison. The iPad survey was taken in February 2010, two months before the iPad came out and the Fire survey was taken in October 2011, 18 months after the iPad came out. In the 20 months between the surveys the iPad has validated the market for tablets. Of course more people want/need a tablet now after seeing all the cool things a tablet (read: iPad) can do over the past year and a half.

2. Apple has a healthy margin on iPads whereas Amazon is reportedly selling the Fire at or below cost. If tablets turn out like phones, then I'd rather be Apple with 5% of the market and 50% of the profit than like Android with more market share and thinner margins.

All that said, as an iPad owner, I did pre-order a Fire since I'm curious to see how a 7" tablet fits into my life. This is what I wrote regarding HP's troubles in the tablet market and is probably why Amazon will success where others have failed (http://martingordon.tumblr.com/post/9049814056/hps-two-probl...):

There’s a glut of 10” tablets on the market. The iPad dominates the market and the ten or so 10” Android tablets do nothing to help HP’s situation there. 7” tablets are completely different when it comes to portability, there isn’t as much competition at this screen size, and Apple has stated that they have no intentions to build a 7” tablet (which means that it’s coming, but it’s not here yet and doesn’t have 80-95% market share like the 10” iPad does). A $250-$300 7” tablet has the opportunity to give HP a nice foothold into the market, and once they do, they can go back and fight for 2nd place in the 10” market. Building 7” marketshare and building consumer mindshare to eliminate also-ran status is the only way HP (or anyone else for that matter) will have a fighting chance in the tablet space.



Played with a family members new 7" Galaxy tab this weekend, and as a fellow iPad owner, I have to admit that 7" is a nice size. Big enough to be very comfortable for most tablet activities, but more manageable in your hands. If there was a choice between 7" or 10" iPads, I bet a lot of people would go for 7".


I agree -- I bought a 7" Galaxy Tab for cheap on Woot, and I immediately preferred the size. Now I pretty much use it only for reading books with the Kindle app. It actually fits some of my coat pockets, but it's too heavy to haul around all day just as a dedicated book reader (it seems to weigh as much as the iPad 2). In the end, it sits on my desk mostly unused, and I use the iPad 2. Still, it has convinced me that a very good 7" tablet could do well.

If I'm Amazon I'd be afraid that, in January, Apple introduces an iPad 3 and drops the iPad 2 to the Fire's price.


A year ago, I thought that 7" would be good, then I got an iPad and got insight.

On an upright iPad I can just read/browse A4 documents, most web sites and 80 chars wide code.

I've asked others that liked 7". For reading literature, 7" is be equally good. Maybe for video, too. (Really young (/near sighted) people can probably read documents, too...)

Anyway, more competition is good here.


The comparison is also faulty because we don't know how the demand will change after Kindle Fire gets more apps and games:

  Just like with movies and TV shows, music, books, and
  magazines, Kindle Fire offers a fully-integrated Android
  apps and games experience - purchase or register for an 
  app or game once, enjoy it on your Kindle Fire and other 
  Android-based devices - and all apps and games are backed 
  up in the Amazon Cloud for re-download anytime
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=Rss...


Amazon is different from other competitors because they know how to make money off a ecosystem.


And yet they don't release any numbers of Kindle sales or profits.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: