Will be interesting if Zoom is compelled to disclose their security architecture. On the same page can they be forced, in court, to make a statement on the interference by the Chinese government?
If the lawsuit gets past the pleadings stage, then relevant information would be subject to discovery. So the plaintiffs would be able to get and use that info in court, but Zoom would probably ask the judge for a protective order
so that it doesn’t become public.
I don't get why this is downvoted? Maybe I was too concise. Then: even if the company may say what they do, the company cannot check and tell what each employee does. This doesn't have to be a malicious intent of the employee, but it can be.
