This very short article mentions the winner's views, as he sees it, on the suitability of Lisp (used by 0.7% of the contestants, surely interesting) for the job. Half the article never even mentions Lisp. And this amounts to a 'promotion fest'?
The point is that he won because he's a great programmer, not because he used Lisp. I was referring to the title and not the article. Do you understand that or have you got more asinine comments?
