Hehe, he reached limit of his tokens /s

That's simply not true. Politicians have always known how to convince young men to go to war and die for them. Nothing is more selfless. So politicians could also convince people to change their lifestyles for the worse to prevent catastrophe.

To be fair, often that convincing happened at gunpoint. I would want to live in a society that enforced climate action with weapons. But of course politicians could do a lot more to motivate climate action before guns would be needed.

Can you share some tips what worked for you?

Generally, facts over instructions. This has been Anthropic's recommendation too, in one of their recent blog posts.

Also the shorter the better, let the model figure out the rest. Overinstruction degrades intelligence. We tend to underestimate their capabilities, we overinstruct them and then complain about them being dumb.

> why can't I buy an upgrade for $30 or whatever?

Because otherwise you won't buy new device for full price

Well yes, of course. That shouldn't be the determinant, though.

There probably also won't be enough people to pay $30 per year to justify the salary of the people to maintain it. Microsoft tried that with Windows 10 and largely gave up outside of Corporations which they had by the gonads.

> We can’t have legitimate debate

I'm not sure people really want that

> Reputation will become more important in the future,

Citation needed

> Let the consumer verify

.. and ..

> and let them decide

Isn't it naive thinking ?

Not remotely. Let people check authenticity of the source and make their own private decisions.

The entire problem is fraud, and governments are hardly immune from that.

> There’s value to actually doing stuff.

Maybe sometimes. But rarely. Usually value is in the actual stuff.

Can't you have performance tests, executed by agent?

This is real risk. Someone could really have a serious health problem.