It is same time hilarious take as described in the article but also a weird take for smart man in many ways: surely entrepreneurship itself will also change if AI did replace most of the human jobs. Why would those psychological factors matter as much as they did?
Same with my daughter. We tried with balance bike, but she didn't adopt it and didn't find it fun to try. We went to training wheels and she was immediately motivated. And at the same time, I've heard success stories with balance bikes from my friends.
Can someone more knowledgeable highlight what kind of security model do these Deno deployments have compared to virtual machines and containers, if they are isolated at the process level.
Oura Health | Multiple positions | Finland, USA, Switzerland | REMOTE possible | Full Time
The Oura ring and the Oura app (https://ouraring.com) are providing a leading solution to understand your sleep and recovery.
We have multiple software engineering roles open both in Finland, Switzerland and USA. They are ranging all the way from SREs and backend engineers to app engineers and data scientists.
An excellent piece. I’m especially interested to hear stories from the fellow HNers about the last point Jocelyn mentions: how to build 2 shipping cultures inside one company, when your business requires it (for example: two-sided marketplaces with different apps for consumer and businesses).
In our case, we have this situation with SW vs HW shipping culture. On the SW side, we focus on continuously developing features and have deliberately emphasized productivity over schedule-predictability, while on the HW side they naturally are focused more on schedule-predictability due to complex dependencies.
Now, this dichotomy has created an interesting discussions inside the company on the right way to ship products and projects, and to me, arguments mainly come from the fact that people come from the different shipping culture and have hard time to see the benefits and requirements of the other culture.
I also come from a company that ships both HW & SW products. Our HW roots are much deeper than our SW roots and HW shipping mentalities have mostly prevailed (low risk tolerance, waterfall development, strict schedule).
Where we’ve had success is identifying the difference between SW that supports the hardware vs independent SW products that compliment the HW, and choosing to ship those products with different processes. Basically if the SW can support a recurring revenue model it follows a continuous development process. But if the software is really just the “operating system” for the hardware then it ships very much the way the rest of HW ships.
There are several countries that have reaped benefits of nuclear power for decades. In Nordics, both Sweden and Finland has over 30% of electricity generated by nuclear. In Eastern Europe there are also several countries (Ukraina, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia, Czech R) with a big chunk of their electricity generated by nuclear.
This argument doesn’t hold. There are several countries such as Finland that have operated nuclear power plants for decades and do not have ambitions for nuclear bombs.
If you want to go with that argument: cite Japan, not Finland. But it doesn't have to be 100% true to be largely true. The overwhelming majority of nuclear capacity has been built out by nuclear powers or aspiring nuclear powers. And with few exceptions the end of their warhead buildout happens to correlate with the end of their megawatt buildout.
Japan has a stockpile of separated reactor grade plutonium sufficient to make thousands of bombs. This is a deniable kind of proliferation. If push came to shove they could weaponize that material without having to make new plutonium.
(And, yes, reactor grade Pu CAN be used in weapons, with proper design.)
