You'll also go orange [0]

0: https://drink4good.com/can-drinking-too-much-carrot-juice-tu...

The animation carries it, don't worry.

So many launches don't show what they are. This on the other hand - got it straight away from the animation.

Great job

How does that fit the YC W26?

You building something else and this scratches an itch?

That aside. I actually love this. Anything that helps with the "wtf did you just do?".

If I can still learn I will. If an agent can't reason about the changes made, then they are not good changes.

Enterprise I thought.

Or use it through Vercel [0] with per call zdr.

https://vercel.com/changelog/typesafe-ai-jev-now-available-o...

Yeah, as I understand it, natural language is tokenised and vectorised, and then maths takes ahold.

The model isn't limited to concepts that can be expressed in natural language.

It's only once the AI gets to the output layers that natural language comes back into play.

After all, they're all made out of weights[0].

0: https://maxleiter.com/blog/weights

> The model isn't limited to concepts that can be expressed in natural language.

How do we know for sure? We don't even know how the emergent properties we see actually emerged?

For humans we know for sure that people sometimes have concepts that they have no word for (the reason the phrase "It's on the tip of my tongue" is a phrase, after all).

We don't know this for LLMs. When it makes new phrases, it's always a mixup of two existing words hyphenated (aside, that also seems to be the limits of SOTA models creativity - join two unrelated words together with a hyphen).

LLMs never respond with "It's on the tip of my tongue" type responses, indicating it has a concept but cannot remember (or does not have) a word for that concept. Every human, pre-speech-age, has managed to express or convey concepts that they had no word for.

So, no. I'd need a citation, preferably multiple, that did the trials and found that a model can generate concepts for which it does not have any words for.

I think you miss the point.

You price it at what you think works. There is no push back, so you make room to push the price higher.

You were happy to do it at the original price.

I didn't miss the point, I'm the one that posted the comment. I know precisely how it's used.

Context is everything.

A twee handwritten sign for free range eggs at the roadside is likely to do well.

A handwritten sign for flying lessons on the other hand..

And anyone selling flying lessons could probably afford a graphic designer, it sounds like we agree.

Now that you mention it, I'm pretty sure I recall a hand-painted "Skydiving" sign at some small rural airport...

I was writing a long reply about how even meat bags have amassed enough money and power to rival elected governments. I don't think it's beyond the realm of possibility to think an AI could do that.

Couple that with mass unemployment in an incredibly vast, diverse population of individuals with individual moral boundaries willing to do whatever for money.

And then.. figured that you must be aware because it's been explored constantly in sci-fi for many, many years.

Let's hope for the culture at least.

It's the bobiverse by Dennis E Taylor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_E._Taylor

_It’s not just fantasy, it’s plagiarism._