Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Smoosh's commentslogin


> After the publication went live, Revolut reassured that the review is still ongoing. "We have so far still found no indications of any breach."

> "We have checked the user and card identifiers contained in the alleged records against our systems, and none of them correspond to valid or genuine Revolut identifiers," the spokesperson said.


Your last paragraph could pertain to the use of Flock cameras on the population in general.

Hopefully!

This video shows more, but is light on explanatory details.

https://youtu.be/aYocEZTXO44


> If we don't crack down hard on this shit now we'll pay for it later.

The USA provided an excellent example for us to learn from. But I do wonder if this cancer of corruption has already spread worldwide and is too powerful to stop the well financed populism through which it spreads.


I think The Dictator covered this:

https://youtu.be/NYJ2w82WifU


They name the new one The Largest Pacific Striped Octopus

“You’re folding it wrong”

Fatal error? More like “a spot of bother”.

Yes, though the second part is the more important and also possible without the other.


It is easier to do with a clear funding stream. Having it happen at point of sale means that funding can keep pace with consumption. Ideally you would also have different fees based on the difficulty of processing the item and also some type of redemption fee to help incentivize people to properly dispose of the items.


Sorry to be that guy, but…

https://www.amazon.com.au/hello-Toothbrush-Replacement-Refil...

(And for the record, I think this is an absolutely stupid idea).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: