I guess it's saying how many of the weights are -1, 0 or +1.

It is, but why? And what's with the bizarre way of phrasing that? Why the bizarre observation that, indeed, nobody asked for it?

> sign-balanced to a hundredth of a point with no constraint asking for it."

This isn't their model, this is (probably?) ChatGPT doing a brag / promo deck authorial voice. It routinely uses half a dozen sentence constructions that are relatively uncommon in normal or technical speech. Eccentric. Persuasive. Trying too hard. Restating its point in a promotional way that doesn't sound natural, leading into a sentence where it hyperbolically sells you on having done the impossible.

Normal persuasive speech uses these constructions, especially public speaking doing a VC pitch or an Ancient Aliens, but it would be fucking strange if a person started chaining them in normal conversation and using little else, trying to insinuate competence.

You start to recognize it pretty quickly on Youtube.

I’m hoping it becomes a trend for mocking AI output by ironically using AI tells.

Also, wouldn't normalisation tend to produce a mean of zero in the weights, anyhow?

On a server machine you can have more than 100GB/s of NVMe if you parallelize (RAID 0 and the like). But it's still gonna be noticeably slower.

1536GB of DDR4 ECC server RAM is somewhere between $4000-6000 USD used right now, by the time you put in parallel enough NVME SSD to approach good speeds, you'd be approaching that (and also likely running out of PCI-E bus lanes directly attached to the same motherboard to reasonably do so).

E without a doubt

In Spain (and I believe the EU), it’s required to indicate it.

Can confirm in the Netherlands also. I'm not an influencer so I don't know exactly, but a few years ago there was either a crackdown, an expansion of the rules, or at least a big media campaign by the government to make the influences that focus on a Dutch audience aware of the rules surrounding promoted content

It’s like distributed transactions, or cache-coherency protocols for CPUs.

Edit: aaaand I hadn’t read the article

Never, I hope

Yes, you are. Because those are not actual stated reasons from the developer.

There are no stated reasons from the developer. So I could be right or wrong. No one knows. Literally the whole thread is people speculating or making random comments about Minecraft and I'm being shit on for the most plausible theory backed up by bug reports here.

Java edition still horribly underperforms. It’s mostly single-threaded and even if they’ve rewritten the lighting engine a few times (those decade old black-block bugs disappeared), the Sodium family of mods show you how much it can be improved.

Sure, but the fact that you can just install Sodium completely obviates the need for the Bedrock version to exist at all.

Bedrock has much better performance so it was used for consoles, but there were already hundreds of thousands of mods for Java edition, thus the split.

Bedrock does have better performance but it is also hella buggy and unstable.

And also it has worse performance than Java if you just install a basic optimization modpack like Adrenaline on Java, which many players do. There's effectively ~zero reason to use Bedrock if you're on PC.

Yes it is. The lack of mods was already a dealbreaker for me, though.

I think the title should mention Emacs somewhere. A terminal emulator is different than a terminal emulator for Emacs.

I agree.

And I would also prefer if the link went to https://github.com/dakra/ghostel instead of the documentation which is not that helpful if you don't know what the project is.

.el = emacslisp file extension

I know this only because I'm an emacs user. Outside that niche .el is an obscure file extension, so, no, it's not that obvious

If you say so. I didn't know that, which supports the suggestion that the title fails to be meaningful.

It's not the same as expecting the reader to know what a terminal is, just in case anyone was thinking of going there next.

> the title fails to be meaningful

It's a weird flex to insist that the titles should always be extremely descriptive. It is already meaningful for the respected audience. Otherwise you can endlessly argue that a florist may not understand what "terminal" and "emulator" are, therefore it should be more descriptive for an occasional florist vising HN. For anyone who doesn't know what .el stands for, they'd click, see it's about Emacs and if not interested - close the tab and forget about it. Takes maybe a second. Not even a smallest imaginable deal - not big at all.