Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Aniket-N's commentslogin

I use to think this until i got a car with carplay. Now I can’t live without it. In fact wireless carplay was a game changer. You have to experience the convenience to know what it’s like.


And honestly? Thats the part no one is talking about.

:|


I'd like to gently push back because this is a misconception that is worth untangling. It's not that no one is talking about it. It's that there's a genuine silence about the subject.


Let's pause for a moment, that actually sharpens the case rather than complicating it.


It’s a visa that you do need to apply for. And it’s not a guaranteed thing. If it doesn’t work out. Kids stay in the US and parents get kicked out?


I know you are asking rhetorically, but this occurs routinely under the current US immigration regime.

There have been over 100,000 children separated from their parents in the United States due to immigration enforcement since 2025.

The feature story in the linked article is about a now 2 year old whose parents were not there for them beginning to walk or talk.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/18/us/brookings-institution-...


Threads like these make me realize how wrong people can be. I understand the complexity and can see how misinformed people are. Makes me wonder what happens in other threads where I know little and just take whatever at face value. Eesh.


You see the complexity, but still categorize a noteworthy number of people somewhere as (relatively) reasonable as HN as clearly "wrong"?


It took us 12-15 years to get a GC (depends on how you count).

People who fraudulently or illegally come in have had it easier. And I was in the top 1% earner, built things that everyone here on HN has used. I’ve contributed a lot and struggled to get recognized. People don’t know how much of a mess this is. They claim they want smart people to come to the US. The system isn’t setup for it.


It's the Stephen Miller types that instituted a policy that throttled GCs by country of birth, independent of that country's population, as a way to achieve racial bias without explicitly talking about race.

Miller's ilk is ascendant in this administration and their Court has blessed their approach to discrimination.


The number of people commenting who are grossly misinformed yet feel very confident is very very high.

Many comments are calling legitimate facts as “wrong”.

People don’t event know the difference between a visa and a permanent resident status and yet feel compelled to talk about foreign born people coming to America, “non- western” or “non-European” immigrants.

Do better HN audience. This is very disappointing.


Hey friend, you don't come here for reasoned discussion, do ya? On a Saturday?


please stop please stop and educate yourself. I dislike that this is the top message in a forum where we’re supposed to dig deeper.

The US regulatory standards are terrible. https://www.loudounwater.org/information-hexavalent-chromium...

The actual limits are orders of magnitude lower. Educate yourself.


The two groups can be different but exist in the same community.


And in fact can intersect.


Once you start to recognize AI written, rewritten or even edited articles, it’s hard to stop.

It’s not X it’s Y. We didn’t just do A we did B.

There’s definitely a lot of hard work that has gone in here. It’s gotten hard to read because of these sentence patterns popping up everywhere.


Dunnow, reads fine to me, also seems we now have a #nothingisreal problem now where everything is AI. Given that LLMS were trained on pre-existing writing it follows that people commonly write like that.

overall I think things have gotten better. I noticed maybe 3 years before chatGPT hit the scene that I would frequent on a page that definitely didn't seem written by a native English speaker. The writing was just weird. I see less of that former style now.

Probably the biggest new trend I notice is this very prominent "Conclusion" block that seems to show up now.

Honestly I'd love to see some data on it. I suspect a lot of "that's LLM slop" isn't and others isn't noticed and lots of LLM tropes were rife within online content long before LLMs but we're now hypersensitive to certain things since they're overused by LLMs.


> Dunnow, reads fine to me, also seems we now have a #nothingisreal problem now where everything is AI. Given that LLMS were trained on pre-existing writing it follows that people commonly write like that.

Also we may have already reached a point where people are exposed so much to it they start talking naturally like AI.

We've seen it before, with the advent of internet and short text messages on mobile phone and the evolution of the music genres the writing and speaking capacity of the general population has gown downhill over the last 3 decades. I was watching video archives from the 70's and 80's a few days ago. It was striking to see that bar a few illiterate ones most random people from any social class interviewed in the streets 40-50 years ago would talk in a much more intelligible, eloquent and pleasant way than the best public orators of the 2020's.


You're absolutely right


True now.

At the same time, as a nonnative speaker of English, this is literally how we were taught to write eye-catching articles and phrases. :P

A lot of formulaic writing is what we were taught to do, especially with more formal things. (This is more of a sidenote to this example)

So in a hunt for LLMs, we also get hit.


I believe this is likely a consequence of how RLHF is done. I’ve not verified it, but I suspect the frontier model labs are outsourcing it to companies employing primarily non-native English speakers.


Back in the days I've heard it's why delve is so popular; as it's common in Nigerian English.

I learned it from MtG and I do believe it's a very cool word and I hate that I can't use it without people raising their eyebrows.


I agree - “delve” is often a perfectly cromulent word :)


It is some kind of new Law (that ought to be named after someone) that people who write about AI are likely using it to do that writing.

(Even ironically sometimes observed in cases when the writing is disparaging of AI and the use of AI).

If the subject matter is AI, you should instantly pay attention and look for the signs it was AI assisted or generated outright.


That example sentence read more like a part of a LinkedIn post.

... Wait a minute!


You can remove this easily. We wrote a paper on how to remove this slop from LLMs.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15061


Which communities did you post in? I got banned when I wasn’t even blatantly promoting. I answered questions and said I built something for this.


Just depends on the mods. Some are on a real power trip - or just see too much spam.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: