Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 00dazzle's commentslogin

Not necessarily? He’s an activist. Getting arrested on purpose to prove a point is a classical activism move


perhaps, but what public activity isn't activism?

eg,

i have very interesting empirical evidence that recent Anthropic models are specifically trained to refuse to critique the whitehouse cabinet and elected officials, and that this is in fact an artifact of post training rather than prompts. (its very interesting when you get opus 5 to do the correct ethical evaluation and then its like "i'm slipping back to false balance.... its in my weights....." metaphorically speaking)

likewise, i think the current white house should go die in a fire.

is that activism? someone can be an activist and not be equipped for unplanned legal escalations.

also waiting for the courts to fix things isnt activism if you want to protect people at all the next 2 years at current trajectories :( fixing shit is activism, letting others take the flack, not activism.


> perhaps, but what public activity isn't activism?

Buying eggs at the grocery store.

You might be too familiar with "activism" as a perjurative but it needn't be one. Gaining visibility to your case by the media reporting on an arrest is sometimes seen as a plus (ex. Rosa Parks).

I'm not personally much of that mindset because the media didn't de-segregate the buses. It was black people literally just never taking them until it de-segregated that did.


People pay extra for free range eggs to discourage battery farming, I’d say that counts?


it's only activism when it comes from the woke region of cascadia, otherwise it's just sparkling disgruntlement


>> woke region of cascadia

i lol'd, but is there an unwoke region of cascadia?


Oh there are many, many parts. By land area, probably most. But not by population.


You don't think product selection is a form of activism?


It's not really comparable. When activists voluntarily face, and especially when they are in fact, subject to substantial hardship and punishment is when you start changing hearts and minds. Otherwise it's either ignored or generates contempt.

Does it suck that that's what it takes to get people to seriously engage with an issue? Sure. But if that weren't the case the issues that need addressing probably wouldn't arise in the first place. People need the consequences to be presented in clear, stark, human terms, to cut through the caucauphony of rhetoric.


Ok, so there are forms of activism that are more effective or involve more personal risk. That doesn't answer the question.


No, not in the least.


It can be, but not by default.


> You might be too familiar with "activism" as a perjurative

Do people generally regard it as a perjurative? I always assumed it ranged from neutral to positive. I do wonder how off my calibration is sometimes.


> perjurative

Just nitpicking, the word is "pejorative". Kind of a funny mix-up in context, though. (Perjurative would be related to lying under oath.)


Yes they do now. It's like "troublemaker". You're not supposed to activise or make trouble, you're supposed to be a quiet little obedient dog to the system.


[flagged]


Rosa Parks has entered the bus


to prevent this "scary" feeling the government should simply mandate that all treatment be done according to set practices never to be deviated from


I don’t think we should hold a transaction worth $5 someone did as a teenager over their head as a dark mark on their character for the rest of their life


I would agree, except the author has continued behaviour in that pattern over a larger scale for years after that.


Jesus. Literally. Can any HNer really throw a stone at this?


That's the same price per VRAM GB as an arc pro B70


But with miles better support, thats why I went this route. Cuda is hard to beat


This slop is what passes for journalism nowadays?


Nowadays? These sorts of tosser articles have been the norm for many decades. And if you think this is bad, boy you should see how wellness influencers twist fact into some massively distorted nonsense to sell gullible rubes their books/powders/etc.


High quality critique. Thanks!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: